Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society (JSLPS) is a government-supported organization focused on rural livelihood promotion and community empowerment in Jharkhand, India. The society implements programs to strengthen self-help groups (SHGs), pr...
"I joined as a field coordinator and stayed for three years — you will learn more in one month here than in many office jobs. The field exposure is intense but rewarding."
"Support from teammates is real; we cover for each other during busy seasons. Still, you will need patience with bureaucracy."
"As a technical staff member, I appreciated the training programs. You’ll see a lot of capacity-building opportunities, though pay and permanence were concerns."
These short voices reflect a mix of pride in results and frustration with administrative limits. If you are considering working here, expect lots of hands-on work and a community-driven feel.
The company culture at Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society leans toward mission-driven public service. People tend to care about the social impact and community outcomes more than corporate optics. Teamwork is common: staff share field learnings, help mobilize groups, and collaborate with government departments and NGOs.
At the same time, culture is shaped by layered approvals and government processes. Decision-making can be slow, and that affects agility. Still, there is a strong orientation toward learning and social accountability. If you are passionate about rural livelihoods, working at Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society will feel meaningful.
Work-life balance at Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society varies by role. Field staff and project implementers often work long days with travel and occasional weekend events. Office-based and MIS staff usually have more regular hours and occasional remote flexibility.
You will notice seasonal peaks (campaigns, audits, trainings) that demand extra time. Managers often try to accommodate time-off after busy periods, but formal leave and flexibility depend on the specific project rules.
Job security is mixed. There are permanent posts in the society, but a large proportion of roles are contract-based, tied to project funding or donor timelines. Contracts may be renewed, but renewals depend on continued funding and project performance.
Overall, core administrative staff will have better stability. Project staff should expect fixed-term engagements with potential for extension rather than guaranteed long-term permanence.
Leadership combines government-appointed and technical project managers. Leaders are generally committed to the mission and maintain relationships with state departments and donors. Management focuses on compliance, reporting, and results.
However, bureaucracy influences pace and decision-making. If you prefer flat, fast-moving organizations, you will find the structure cautious and sometimes slow. Conversely, if you value stakeholder engagement and policy-level coordination, leadership offers useful exposure.
Managers at the society are often experienced in rural development and are approachable on program issues. They tend to be supportive of field teams and prioritize community outcomes. Performance feedback is given, but formal HR coaching can be patchy.
Expect managers to be balancing reporting requirements, fund constraints, and field realities. That means you will frequently find managers helpful on technical matters but constrained when it comes to rapid personnel decisions or salary negotiations.
Training and capacity building are real strengths. Staff receive workshops on SHG promotion, financial inclusion, MIS, livelihood enterprise support, and social safeguards. Many learning opportunities come via donor collaborations and state-led training modules.
On-the-job learning is significant; younger staff can build practical skills quickly. Formal career development plans are less consistent and often tied to project budgets.
Promotion opportunities are limited and usually tied to vacancies, funding availability, and administrative rules. Internal mobility into technical or regional roles is possible, and proven performers can move into supervisory posts.
If you are seeking fast upward movement, this may not be the ideal place. If you prefer gradual growth within a mission-led public organization, you will find pathways, just slower and less structured than in private firms.
Salaries vary widely by role and funding source. Approximate ranges:
These are indicative and depend on donor funds, project scale, and whether the role is permanent or contractual.
Bonuses and incentives are limited and project-dependent. Some projects offer performance-linked incentives, travel allowances, and honoraria for meeting targets. Year-end bonuses are uncommon for contract staff but occasional recognition awards, certificates, and small monetary incentives may be given.
Health and insurance benefits vary. Permanent staff typically have access to government/organization-linked health schemes. Contract staff sometimes receive group health coverage depending on project provisions. Overall, benefits are not as comprehensive as private-sector packages, so you will want to clarify coverage before joining.
Employee engagement includes regular review meetings, training workshops, field days, statewide convergence events, and festivals. Team outings are infrequent, but there are many community-level events where staff participate. Engagement is often program-focused rather than purely social.
Remote work support is mixed. Office-based administrative and MIS roles can sometimes work from home, and there were temporary arrangements during emergencies (for example, COVID-related adaptations). Fieldwork roles require presence, so remote flexibility is limited. Internet infrastructure and remote IT support vary by district.
Typical office hours align with government schedules, roughly 9:30 AM to 5:30 PM, but field staff frequently work 10–12 hour days during campaigns. Travel time adds to daily hours. Expect variability based on project cycles.
Attrition is moderate to high among contract staff, primarily due to fixed-term contracts and competition with private-sector pay. Layoffs are not common in a mass sense, but project closures and funding gaps lead to non-renewals. Core permanent staff show lower turnover.
Overall, the society scores well for mission alignment, on-the-ground learning, and community impact. It scores moderately for pay, promotion speed, and bureaucratic agility. If your priority is meaningful public service, strong local exposure, and learning in livelihoods work, this is a solid place to be. If you prioritize rapid career advancement, high pay, or constant remote flexibility, you will find trade-offs. Overall rating: 3.5 out of 5 — meaningful work with structural limits.
Read authentic experiences from current and former employees at Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society
Be the first to share your experience working at Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society. Your review will help other job seekers make informed decisions.
Write the first review